Relation of Social Capital in each exploitation systems and participation in range management plan Performance (Case study: Semnan Province range management plan)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Social capital is one of the important concepts in sociology that it is necessary for social correlation and resistant development. The subject of this study is investigation of correlation between social capital factors and participation of exploitation in range management plans Performance in each exploitation systems. Reference population in this study according to the grazing license, was divided to private exploitation, collective exploitation and conciliar exploitation. Based on stratified random sampling method and Cochran formula, the sample volumes 50 of Ranches were estimated. For data collection was used questioner and interview. That interviewed with 93 people of exploitations. Descriptions result showed that in this area 66% of stockholders used rangeland as collective exploitation, 20% as conciliar exploitation and 14% as private exploitation do exploit from rangelands.Appreciation result showed that there is significant differences between social capital among and participation of exploitation in range management plan Performance (P<0.05). Kruskal Wallis test showed that there is significant difference between social capital with rangeland exploitation systems in this area(P<0.05).Finally index of social capital in this area showed that private exploitation has the highest social capital for range management plan Performance. It seems that Amplification of social capital items between exploitation, increase cooperation of exploitation in participation of range management plans performance.

Keywords

References

[1]. Azkia, M., and Gaffari, G. (2001). Investigation of relationship between confidence and social participate in rural areas of Kashan. Journal of social science Letter, 23, 97-111.
[2]. Azkia, M., and Firoozabadi, S.A. (2008). Investigation of Social capital in kinds exploitation systems of land and effective factors on conversion peasant exploitation to cooperation. Journal of social science Letter, 33(1), 97-111.  
[3]. Firoozabadi, S.A. (2006). Social Capital and economic development in Tehran. Journal of Social Health, 23, 197-214.
[4]. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign affairs, 74(5), 89-103.
[5]. Gasemi, V. (2005). Treats  Ceronach Alfa in social science, Journal of Esfahan university, No 2(19), 155-174. 
[6]. Heydari, G., Agili, S.M., Barani, H., Gorbani, G., Mahboobi, M.R., and Khosh Far G.R. (2009). Infraction of social capital on participatory in rangemanagement plan on exploitation view point in Baladeh rangelands Mazandaran Province. Rangeland Journal, 3(1), P 121-137.
[7]. Hosseini Nasab, M., Barani, H.,  and Dianati, G. (2011). Investigation of relationship between kind of ownership and range condition (Arak rangelands). Journal of Range and Desert Area Research, 17(1), 166-179.
[8]. Karimian, A.A. (2011). Investigation and comparison of range condition in different utilization methods (Case study research: winter rangelands in Semnan Province). Journal of Rural Research, 2(2), 95-110.
[9]. Karimnya, M. (1990). Questioner design and Viewpoints evaluation, Samt publication, 221 P.
[10]. Krebs, C.J. (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd ed. Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park, California, USA.624 Pp.
[11]. Nateg Poor, M.G., and Firoozabadi, S.A. (2006). Formation of social capital and effective factor on it. Journal of social science, 28(1), 160-190.
[12]. Quinn, Ch., Huby, M., Kiwasilla, H.C., and Lovett, J. (2007). Design principle and common pool resource management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid 13-Tanzania. Journal Environmental management, 48, 100-113.
[13]. Rafipoor, F. (2008). Reserch techniques in social sciences, SherkatsahamiEnteshar Publication, 224P.
[14]. Sabatini, F. (2009). Social capital as social network: A new framework for measurement and an empirical analysis of its determinate and consequences. Journal Social well-being, 2, 5-18.
Journal of Arid Biome
Volume 6, Issue 1
October 2016
Pages 45-55

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics