Integrated Drought Monitoring in the Minab Esteghlal Dam Basin through Copula-Based Modeling of the Interdependence among Precipitation, Soil Moisture, and Surface Runoff

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student, Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

5 Assistant Professor, Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

10.29252/aridbiom.2026.4152

Abstract

Drought is one of the most complex and costly natural hazards, particularly in arid and semi‑arid regions, affecting different components of the hydrological cycle such as precipitation, runoff, and soil moisture. In this study, a comprehensive multivariate drought index based on copula functions, named the Joint Drought Hydro‑Meteorological Index (JDHMI), was developed to monitor meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural droughts simultaneously in the Minab Independence Dam watershed in southern Iran. Monthly precipitation data from 15 rain gauge stations, streamflow data from the Berentin hydrometric station, and satellite‑based soil moisture data from the GLDAS dataset during the period 1993–2023 were used. First, the univariate drought indices including SPI‑12, SRI‑12, and SMDI‑12 were calculated. Then, the dependence structure among these variables was modeled using copula functions. The results of marginal distribution fitting indicated that the logistic distribution provided the best fit for precipitation and runoff with AIC values of 630.94 and 563.36, respectively, while the normal distribution was selected for soil moisture with an AIC value of 636.07. Copula analysis showed that the Frank copula performed best in modeling dependence. The Kendall’s tau coefficients were estimated as 0.441 for SPI12–SRI12 and 0.567 for SRI12–SMDI12, indicating moderate to strong dependence between these variables. The developed multivariate index demonstrated higher capability in identifying severe and persistent drought events. The maximum drought intensity, duration, and magnitude obtained from the JDHMI were 3.35, 10 months, and 21.4, respectively. Moreover, the correlation of JDHMI with SPI12 and SRI12 was 0.81 and 0.71, respectively, showing strong agreement with conventional indices. Principal component analysis also revealed that the first component explained about 92.06% of the total variance. Overall, the proposed copula‑based index provides a more comprehensive representation of drought conditions by integrating precipitation, runoff, and soil moisture information, and can serve as an effective tool for drought monitoring and water resources management in arid regions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]. Azhdari, Z., Bazrafshan, O., Shekari, M., & Zamani, H. (2020). Three-dimensional risk analysis of hydro-meteorological drought using multivariate nonlinear index: Z. Azhdari et al. Theoretical and Applied Climatology142(3), 1311-1327. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-020-03365-3
[2]. Bazrafshan, O., Zamani, H., & Shekari, M. (2020). A copula‐based index for drought analysis in arid and semi‐arid regions of Iran. Natural Resource Modeling33(1), e12237. DOI: 10.1111/nrm.12237
[3]. Genest, C., Rémillard, B., & Beaudoin, D. (2009). Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study. Insurance: Mathematics and economics44(2), 199-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.12.005
[4]. Govindaraju, R. S. (2019). Review of copulas and their applications in water resources engineering by lan zhang and VP Singh. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.000182
[5]. Hao, Z., & Singh, V. P. (2015). Drought characterization from a multivariate perspective: A review. Journal of Hydrology527, 668-678. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.058
[6]. Jin, S., & Feng, G. (2013). Large-scale variations of global groundwater from satellite gravimetry and hydrological models, 2002–2012. Global and Planetary Change106, 20-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.04.006
[7]. Joe, H. (2014). Dependence modeling with copulas. CRC press.
[8]. Kao, S. C., & Govindaraju, R. S. (2010). A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. Journal of Hydrology380(1-2), 121-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.018
[9]. Kumar, Y., Singh, S., & Kumar, A. (2025). Copula-based meteorological drought risk assessment in Northwest India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research32(59), 31455-31474. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-30889-6
[10]. Lan, X., Luo, Y., Leng, G., & Cao, J. (2025). A novel copula-based index for agricultural drought monitoring: integrating vegetation response and meteorological drought dynamics in the middle–lower Yangtze River Basin. Ecological Indicators178, 114107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.114107
[11]. Liu, R., Yin, J., Kang, S., Yang, Y., Liu, P., Guo, J., & Gu, X. (2023). Machine learning-constrained projection of bivariate hydrological drought magnitudes and socioeconomic risks. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions.
[12]. McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., & Kleist, J. (1993, January). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology (Vol. 17, No. 22, pp. 179-183).
[13]. Nabaei, S., Sharafati, A., Yaseen, Z. M., & Shahid, S. (2019). Copula based assessment of meteorological drought characteristics: regional investigation of Iran. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology276, 107611. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107611
[14]. Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An introduction to copulas. New York, NY: Springer New York.
[15]. Obasi, G. O. P. (1994). WMO's role in the international decade for natural disaster reduction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society75(9), 1655-1661.
[16]. Rodell, M., Houser, P. R., Jambor, U. E. A., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng, C. J., ... & Toll, D. (2004). The global land data assimilation system. Bulletin of the American Meteorological society85(3), 381-394. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381
[17]. Requena, A. I., Flores, I., Mediero, L., & Garrote, L. (2016). Extension of observed flood series by combining a distributed hydro-meteorological model and a copula-based model. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment30(5), 1363-1378. DOI: 10.1007/s00477-015-1113-2
[18]. Shukla, S., & Wood, A. W. (2008). Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophysical research letters35(2). DOI: 10.1029/2007GL032381
[19]. Singh, H. V., Joshi, N., & Suryavanshi, S. (2026). Evaluating hydrological drought characteristics in a semi-arid river basin using the conditional copula approach under the changing climate. Journal of Earth System Science135(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-026-02757-9
[20]. Wilhite, D. A. (2002, November). Combating drought through preparedness. In Natural resources forum (Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 275-285). Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.00031
[21]. Wang, H., Zhu, Y., Qin, T., & Zhang, X. (2022). Study on the propagation probability characteristics and prediction model of meteorological drought to hydrological drought in basin based on copula function. Frontiers in Earth Science10, 961871. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.961871
[22]. Zhong, Z., Zhao, Q., Sang, G., Xue, J., Wang, J., & Lin, F. (2026). Copula-based composite drought index combining precipitation, temperature, and NDVI used for drought monitoring. Theoretical and Applied Climatology157(2), 103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.135059
[23]. Zhang, Q., Lu, Z., Ying, J., Qiu, Y., Wang, P., Xu, Z., ... & Li, Y. (2026). Nonstationary agricultural drought risk under compound meteorological drought and hot conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 135059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135059